The Unhappy Democracy Essay -- Essays Papers

The Unhappy stateAbstractPlato/Socrates defined democracy as the government of the mickle. He modeled his popular baseb exclusively club after Athens at the time, a small city-state where every braggart(a) male had a vote. The transition to democracy occurred after a transmutation in which the rich oligarchic rulers were overthrown and disposed of and the poor gained control. Then, they provided everyone with equal rights. Democracy was characterized as a bazaar of constitutions where every citizen chose his own path in life. on that point was no obligatory military service, no privileged classes, and those that title to love society were able to acquire the most creator. Individuals may hold in desired honor in the morning and wealth in the evening. There was no consistent goal that individuals pursued and their desires changed constantly. However, democracy, unlike other flawed societies, did not forbid the practice of philosophy it had been indifferent to it. Eventually , Things everywhere are just bursting with the spirit of improperness. Soon children disobey parents, students disobey teachers, and a brush aside towards authority develops. Citizens become divided into three classes the ruling class of profligate politicians, the middle businessman/merchant class, and the large mass of poor people who own little property and mostly stay out of politics. The politicians grow to pass laws that tax the capitalists in order to meet their spending promises. Next, a reactionary political party was formed by the wealthy in order to resist the taxes. After a while, the poor became frustrated with all of the disorder and selected a champion of the people who eventually acquired absolute power and corrupted by it to become a tyrant who would disregar... ...vide The reason creation that individuals constantly focus on fulfilling desires rather than applying reason to guide their will. Consequently, their instinct is always in a state of flux rather t han creation in harmony. Therefore, only the ideal state, not democracy, is capable of creating the conditions necessary for its citizens to expunge happiness because it is founded on justice instead of liberty, which produces the harmony of the soul. In conclusion, democratic citizens shall never find avowedly happiness in their political organization because liberty is practiced at the expense of the liberties of others, the inherent lack of constancy will eventually lead to situation in which individual liberty is rigorously suppressed, and because the pursuit of liberty is futile because it does not lead to true happiness. Democracy truly is the worst kind of government, after despotism.