How did we come to be Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 4750 words

How did we come to be - Essay ExampleWhere does this power to will come fromIf we observe our own body parts and their movements as if we are looking at a Television program, the reality behind our origins posterior be cognise to a great extent. This is clearly an experiment just about which a number of scientists and critical analysts apparently neer image of doing it while entering into their voluminous research on the development, nature and logic of origins of man. If this experiment is opted for, simply atomic number 53idea is likely to follow. This will be an objective realization of the power and force of idol behind every living and non-living being and entity. This is ultimate wisdom that does not transform for there is aught beyond it.There is a well established social perspective. It is the universally accepted principle of lurch as the law of Nature. This law by itself has never changed Why If it is true, it must(prenominal) also change with time. However, no one can deny living by this reality of change. What a great quandary The law is there but it cannot be there if it is to continue. Similar situation appears to be existing about the question How make believe we humans evolved in the present pulsating form of precious beingsSo many schools of thought and ways of argument have come up, as it were, since the beginning of human inquiry into society. Darwinian, Big Bang, cosmic Evolution, Stellar Evolution, Chemical Evolution, Planetary Evolution, Organic Evolution, Macro Evolution, Micro Evolution and Pragmatism theories vie with one another to solve the apparent mystery of origins of man.1 Despite so much of variety of material and belles-lettres available on How did we come to be there is utter dearth of rock solid faithfulness about this matter. Evolutionary theorists are generally modern scientists from biology, chemistry and physics. They believe and write about that phenomenon which can be verified through their own microscope s and eyes only. Pragmatists like Charles Sanders Peirce, William crowd together and John Dewey appear to have gone even a few steps ahead of the evolutionary theorists. They as such invoke rejection of the transcendental approach to truth, logic and inquiry.2 For Peirce, pragmaticism and fallibilism were the essence of all logic. For him, metaphysics embraces a theory of cosmic evolution and a theory of causal laws. There has to be a cause and effect relationship infixed and explicit in an experience. All inquiry - including the question of origins of man - must follow this causal law. William James also picked up pragmatist outlook of Peirce and further popularized these ideas.3 Quite in the similar vain, John Dewey made inquiry, kinda than truth or knowledge, the essence of logic.4Critical AssessmentIndeed, these evolutionary and pragmatist analyses are having their own limitations just as any other approach to a world view may be having. One miserable aspect is very obvious here. Most of the noted and vibrant minds and great critics generally do not look beyond their own perception. At times, the most obvious argument is ignored for it lies just under their feet within their immediate reach. If an analyst wants to be objective and scientific in approach, then one must not ignore the most obvious. When dealing with evolution, origins of man and the power behind human