Political Contention Essay Essays

Political Contention Essay Essays Political Contention Essay Essay Political Contention Essay Essay Solita Collas-Monsod is a professor at the University of the Philippines: Diliman and a author in the Filipino Daily Inquirer. Solita Collas-Monsod’s article entitled â€Å"The Trillanes Myth† was published or appeared in the Filipino Daily Inquirer and was last updated in September 3. 2007. The writer was able to catch the attending of its audience. and she was able to efficaciously utilize the rubric of her article to give a bird’s oculus position of what is stored for the readers. She besides starts her column through a statement of her base sing the issue being discussed. The writer wanted to demo or inform the audience and or the readers of the Filipino Daily Inquirer about the Trillanes group which started a putsch d’ etat in Oakwood Hotel. or the good known â€Å"Oakwood ‘Mutiny† . wherein there were 300 uniformed military officers and work forces who were guided or led by Sen. Antonio Trillanes IV. Her statements besides province that the Court. led by July 25 order of RTC Judge Oscar B. Pimentel. should go on its house base with respects to enforcing the necessary jurisprudence or exercise authorities authorization. without proof of the badges of inequality. She assumed that the universe. more specifically the sympathisers of the Trillanes group or the military officers. should non be deranged or persuaded by the â€Å"idealisms and principles† of the Trillanes group. She besides states that the audience. we. should non be blinded by the myths or prevarications which the Trillanes group gives us. and that we should lodge or be steadfast with our authorities regulations about putsch d’etats. Solita Collas-Monsod values the truth and in seeking proper justness for such lawbreakers of the jurisprudence. She strongly believes that proper justness or penalty in conformity with the authorities Torahs should be imposed on the Trillanes group. and we should make this objectively. non subjectively. Monsod was able to specify footings clearly in her article. Solita Collas-Monsod did her assignment or did basic research. therefore. she was able to back up her statements with ample and adequate facts. The statement for me is successful. and it does convert me. There are facts or sufficient back uping statements used by Monsod in her article and these facts or statements seem truly dependable. My beliefs and line of thought was the same as Monsod with respects to the â€Å"Oakwood ‘Mutiny† . more specifically about the Trillanes group. Monsod’s statement strengthened my former belief about proper authorities executing of its Torahs. Politically talking. this is truly an eye-opening article non merely to the populace but to the authorities and its functionaries every bit good. more specifically to the Judicial Court. There are times when I had little uncertainties with respects the Judiciary system of the Philippines before. but because of Monsod’s article. and facts that she stated about the actions taken by the Court. led by Judge Pimentel. these uncertainties are non gone. I believe that so. the political universe still has its â€Å"impartiality. † Solita Collas-Monsod’s article affects the political procedure by merely beef uping the execution of Judicial jurisprudence and in informing the populace about the Trillanes group. The authorities and the populace. or the audience. are at the advantage. whereas the Trillanes group is decidedly in the losing terminal. Work Cited: Collas-Monsod. Solita. â€Å"The Trillanes Myth. † The Filipino Daily Inquirer. 2007.